?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Dover trial - Arvind Narayanan's journal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

Dover trial [Dec. 22nd, 2005|01:03 am]
Arvind Narayanan
The real significance of the Dover trial is not just the banning of the teaching of ID in public schools (which would follow from establishing that ID was born from creationism), but that the court went further to make the determination that ID is not science. Some significant quotes:
For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the religious nature of ID [intelligent design] would be readily apparent to an objective observer, adult or child...

The evidence at trial demonstrates that ID is nothing less than the progeny of creationism...

...we have addressed the seminal question of whether ID is science. We have concluded that it is not, and moreover that ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents...

The breathtaking inanity of the Board’s decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial. The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.
Sweet.
LinkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: mssnlayam
2005-12-21 08:39 pm (UTC)
Science education is saved --- temporarily, in one particular corner of the globe.

In India, the Supreme court failed to stop the BJP agenda of starting astrology courses in universities.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: kadambarid
2005-12-21 08:45 pm (UTC)
There supposedly are some 3500 astronomers in the US, as opposed to 13000 astrologers!
Howzzat for trivia!:(
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)