|More bitching about commuting
||[Jun. 12th, 2007|07:06 pm]
So I need to drive up to SF to do a car switcheroo. I'm done with work and I'm sitting in front of my computer hitting refresh on the traffic report page again and again waiting for Northbound 101 to clear up. I'm not completely sure how this is better than sitting in traffic, but it sure feels better :-) Commuting, thinking about commuting and planning my commute (oh, and blogging about commuting) seem to be taking up more and more of my day.
If the roads were up to me, this is what things would be like. Brace yourself.
- All areas of cities except for the hip parts downtown would be urban sprawl. Freeways would criss-cross the whole country, so that city driving would be minimal.
- All roads would have at least two lanes. One idiot won't be able to hold up the traffic any more.
- Intersections would be minimal. Roundabouts would be the preferred junction type.
- Where intersections existed, there would always be a left turn lane and a right turn lane when you approach the intersection. That way, you could always make a right on a red if there was no cross traffic, and left turners could never hold up the traffic headed straight. (This fact alone currently wastes a significant chunk of the time in city driving.)
- Minimum speed limits would be strictly enforced everywhere (except for the rightmost lane). Since all roads have at least two lanes, this wouldn't be much of a problem.
- On freeways, access to lanes wouldn't be based on carpooling or anything stupid like that, but instead on how much vehicle registration fees you paid (there'd be several levels and you can choose which bracket you want to be in). If you paid enough, you can always be sure of being able to use the leftmost lane and being sure of getting to your destination at the planned time.
Ok. Tell me how much you hate it in the comments.
hey nice stuff da! when I took this job 10 months back and started driving 26 km each way across bangalore every day, I too started getting similar ideas.
i completely agree with most of the points you have put here. especially about having differnet lanes for left and right and straight while approaching signals, minimum speed limits etc.
tell me this, are buses a big problem in the US also? here the thing is there are some extremely busy roads (2 lanes each way) where every bus stop holds up traffic. buses TRAVEL on the right lane and move left to stop (btw this is India, so make the necessary adjustments), and cut right immediately after every stop. I know of at least 2 roads here where most of the traffic jams are caused by bus stops!
2007-06-13 06:59 am (UTC)
Make your ideas scale
Make your ideas work for the people who wont/can't drive, don't want to waste time commuting and will not add to the parking problem. Oh, and see how you can lower the environmental costs while you are at it. I want to see what happens when you get to the point of say, 200000 or more people per sq km, each with a car. Or when you have more cars than the roads can accomodate.
skthewimp, I solved that problem by relocating back to Mumbai. Working mass transit is great.
2007-06-13 07:38 am (UTC)
Re: Make your ideas scale
I already solved the crowding problem in my hypothetical scenario, in the first bullet point. Cities would be sprawling, not vertical. That puts a limit on the population density.
For the people who don't want to drive, live downtown. It's more expensive, but that's the tradeoff. Actually the same tradeoff exists now, only it'd be more acute in my scenario.
2007-06-13 08:42 am (UTC)
Re: Make your ideas scale
How big is your city? Bangalore is a small city to me, and Bangalore and Delhi show urban sprawl.
You aren't showing environmental friendliness either. What would happen to your city when gas hits 6 USD/gallon? 10 USD/gallon? What happens when you need to accomodate 200K people downtown in normal work hours (each with a car -- think parking)?
Not so much out here. First, there are very few buses. Second, they tend to ply on the major roads which have more than one lane. Third, there is usually a shoulder for the bus stop; the bus doesn't stop on the road itself.
2007-06-18 03:56 am (UTC)
Bangalore public(aamAdmi) rely on buses for most of city commutes.
City is waiting to get metro train rapid transport system to distribute the crowd. In favour of people the thunb rule is to give way for public transport vehicles than private ones(try distributing a packed crowd on vehicles compared to single bus ).
Given the small lanes ,prvt. vehicles > BMTC buses and growing commuters I think double deckers, on-the-fly dividers made overnight on slightly wide roads (common nowadays), collapsible markers to distinguish bus stops ( require space so not possible everywhere) make sense.